The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant

The chart illustrates traditional and modern methods of manufacturing black tea and its step by step process. The process goes through various stages to produce the end product.

In the initial step farmers pick fresh tea leaves from the plant, in order to ensure top quality they only pick bud and two top leaves. Then it passed through a process called, withering where air passed through leaves on the rack to get the moisture out. In the traditional method, leaves then rolled flat and then broken through a process called rolling to release enzymes from the leaves. After that, the processed leaves enters in to the fermentation process, as a result the colour of leave change to copper color. In the end it's being dried out using hot air dryers to get flavor and aroma and also clear the moisture from the loose tea.

In contrast, the modern method use cut, torned and curled leaves to produce tea bags instead of loose tea by a process called cutting. Before that it goes the same two initial steps just like the traditional process. The cutting process creates smaller granular pieces of tea leaves. Then it pass through the similar process of traditional methods fermentation and drying to produce the tea bags.

In conclusion, inorder to produce black tea both traditional and modern methods follow almost same steps except in the stage two.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (15 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... loose tea by a process called cutting. Before that it goes the same two initial steps...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'passes'?
Suggestion: passes
... granular pieces of tea leaves. Then it pass through the similar process of traditio...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89177489177 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36411995751 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7199593222 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148449240038 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673568829898 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302333874463 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109539687391 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235014814916 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.