the diagram shows the main systems of writing used throughout the world.
The diagram illustrates five different writing systems.
In general terms, the diagram shows that there is wide variation in writing systems around the world.
There are five types of writing systems including Logographic, Abjad, Abjuda, Alphabetic and Syllabic. The Logographic is one type of writing systems. An example of this Chinese, each character represents a word meaning rather than sounds. It is possible for two languages which are different in spoken form to share the same writing system. For example, this is the case with Chinese and Japanese.
On the other hand, there are four types of writing system in which characters represent sounds. For instance, the Abjab which each character represents a consonant sound. Arabic uses this type of system. Related to this is the Abjuda system which each character represents a consonant and vowel. The third type is the Alphabetic. This type is slightly different a that consonant and vowel sounds are represented by different characters. For example, English uses this type of system. Finally, the Syllabic system is used in languages such as Japanese Kana which each character represents a syllable sound.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am shows that there is wide variation in writing systems around the world. There...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, third, for example, for instance, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31891891892 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67098141313 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2814426789 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.6 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3333333333 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245843449882 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102177430083 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101729078033 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206944982906 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10809469343 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.