The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
The bar chart provides information about how commuters travelled to work in a city in Europe in three different years from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of users in car witnessed a dramatically increase in the period while there was a significantly drop in both the proportion of bike and foot.
Turning to details, in 1960, approximately 35% of travelers walked to work, whereas for car, it was only just over 5%. The percentage of people travelled by bus and bike were about 18% and slightly over 25%, respectively. However, in 1980, the proportion of travelers using bus and car to work rose considerably by around 10% and 20%, respectively, especially in bus, which overtook the others as the most popular mode of transport. In contrary, it seems to be seen that less people chose to commute by bike and foot in 1980, so the number of travelers using these modes felt rapidly, to 20% and over 15%, respectively.
In 2000, the figure for car continued to rise gradually to roughly 35%, which is the highest amount in all modes. Regarding bike and foot, there was in a downward trend, so they dropped to under 10% for both ones. Having increased at about 25%, the proportion of people using bus suddenly felt by 10% in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...at the number of users in car witnessed a dramatically increase in the period while there was a signifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
... increase in the period while there was a significantly drop in both the proportion of bike and foot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... In contrary, it seems to be seen that less people chose to commute by bike and foo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66216216216 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70132472379 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563063063063 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.867748158 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243812030362 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997767404275 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107341450925 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152556761923 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139728907647 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.