The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented column graph compares 4 distinct means of transport in terms of the percentage of total commuters they occupied from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, discernible modifications were witnessed in all categories. In addition, commencing as the least popular vehicles, car displayed a significant continuous growth to rank first at the end of this period.
Turning into detail, nearly 35% of travelers went to work on foot in 1960, followed by an over-25-per-cent proportion of bike sector. Over the next two decades, in comparison to the rate of walking citizens, which declined remarkably to more than 15%, that of cycling ones showed a lower level of decrement, which decreased by almost 5%. Downward trends were maintained in both the latter and the former by the year of 2000, remaining at approximately 10% and about 5%, respectively.
Regarding to other vehicles, bus accounted for about 18% of commuters in 1960, which was more than 3 times higher than the figure for car. It reached the peak of over 25% in 1980 before considerably diminishing to more than 15% in 2000. Meanwhile, by contrast, that of car was kept rising consistently, obtaining over 35% of travelers in 2000 and becoming the most common mean of transport among 4 items.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...common mean of transport among 4 items.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08212560386 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9919025354 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661835748792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1509182302 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134361942398 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495484304768 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378173873345 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739524216017 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448949362665 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.