These two pie charts contrast the expenditure in seven categories, food, cars, petrol, restaurants, furniture, computres and books, in the year of 1966 and 1996 by American residents.
Overall, Americans spent a large section of money on food in 1966. By comparison, their majority expending was comprised from cars in 1996.
In 1966, American citizens spent 44% of income on food, which was the largest sector of their expenditure. The second large sector was cars that composed 23% of the total annual spending. By contrast, spending on computer was negligibal, which was merely 1% of the total income. Expenditure on petrol, furniture, restaurants and book were mediorce, which were 6%, 10%, 7% and 6% respectively.
In 1996, the composition of spending altered dramatically compared to that of 1966. Spending on cars constituted the largest section of the annual expenditure, which 45%. By contrast, spending on food regressed to 14%, which ranked the second position. Other expenditures on petrol, restaurant, furniture and computer were 8%, 14%, 8% and 10% respectively. Interestingly, the spending on books declined to 1% of the total expenditure.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43093922652 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08617815255 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.74614821 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102772774223 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044807450782 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454091546187 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074204543461 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278616813756 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.