The stipulated pie diagrams illustrates information regarding the spending pattern of American citizens in various categories in 1966 and 1996. The mentioned parameters are food, cars, petrol, restaurants, furniture, computers and books.`
It has been clear from the data that, in 1966 US citizens spent most of their money on buying food items (44%). Whereas, after about 30 yers they used almost the same proportion of money on their cars.
A detailed view of the charts reveals that, there were some considerable percentage of increase in the spendings regarding some items. The expenditure on computers showed almost 8 fold increase and restaurant bills were almost doubled from 7% to 14% . While, Americans spending on some items like metro and furniture recorded a mere decline of 1% and 2% respectively. An important point to be noted that, US people almost given up their habit of buying books. It showed a 5% decline over the period of time and constituted only 1% of their total spending in 1996.
In conclusion, we can see a great difference with regards to the some items as compared to the past figures. Categories like food and car showed significant changes. However, sectors like furniture and petrol held their proportions even after the 3 decades of time despite some slight changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...bills were almost doubled from 7% to 14% . While, Americans spending on some items...
^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... books. It showed a 5% decline over the period of time and constituted only 1% of their total ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... a great difference with regards to the some items as compared to the past figures. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13551401869 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78478443286 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621495327103 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5965973491 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10239092013 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433191532325 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530076299385 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664249155229 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470265441009 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.