Given are two graphs, while the pie chart shows data about the annual training hours of 4 different courses in a big company, the bar chart illustrates managers and secretaries' attitude toward training.
It is clear from the pie chart that half of the training hours per year are for technical purpose. Additionally, the majority of office workers feel that the training courses are valuable for their jobs.
As regards to pie graph, the hours for technical training programs are highest, at 30 hours annually, compared to a significantly lower amount of time spend for health and safety courses, at only 5 hours. At the same time, while 15 hours per year are for career development classes, the figure for interpersonal skills is slightly lower, at roughly 10 hours.
85% of secretaries surveyed said that the training programs are important for their careers, while this rate for managers is around 75%. Meanwhile, the proportions of workers chose training as a good excuse for change are relatively lower, with 63% of secretaries and 65% of managers. In addition, only around 40 to 50 percent of office workers said training is good for networking. By contrast, the minority of employees think courses are waste of their valuable time, with around 10% of managers and secretaries in the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to train'.
Suggestion: to train
...while, the proportions of workers chose training as a good excuse for change are relativ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72335577306 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0613539784 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164566324197 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812660222217 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604205155969 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126211147613 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636967488914 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.