The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company.

The pie chart combined with the bar chart provides information about the hours in a year that employees spend on indoor training program in a huge financial company with their attitude to this course. It is also worth noting that while those workers invest their training time in technical and career development, health and safety loses its popularity among people. Furthermore, officer workers believe that the program can provide benefits for them.
To specify, the highest hours per year are injected into technical with 30 hours, followed by career development and interpersonal skills at 15 and 10 hours respectively. Suprisingly, there are the lowest hours which occupy one twelveth in the training hours per year.
With regard to officer workers’ attitude to this course, it can be seen that the largest percentages of individuals who agree that this program is important for their jobs with the manager at approximately 85% and the secretary at almost 80%. By contrast, waste of valuable time is the only category, which attract the smallest proportions of both the manager and the secretary.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (6 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24157303371 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79577227855 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9080835612 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864803400026 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395165189479 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678668487598 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555885305466 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639173079685 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.