The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar graph depicts the information about how much global water will be used in three different sectors and the table shows the information about water utilization in two countries such as brazil and congo between 1900 to 2000 years. We can see that in agriculture area most of the water can be used over the hundred years of period.

Overall, We can clearly seen that global water needs rose significantly between hundred years of period and water consumption was considerably higher in Brazil than in the Congo.

To begin with, In the graph, we can see that in 1900, there was 0km3 of water can be used in two sectors such as industrial and domestic use which was the lowest. and it will be constant no use of water until 1940 in these two sectors. As the time passed the use water has been increased gradually in both the sectors like industrial and domestic sector. In the year 2000 there was about 50km3 water can be used in domestic use and as the year passed in industrial sector, the use of water can be go up gradually which was around 500km3 in the year 2000. Taking about agriculture sector in the year 1900 the total use of water was approximately 500km3. and in the end of these period in the year 2000, the use of water was highest which was 3000km3.

Moving further, In the table, we can see that water consumption was considerably highr in brazil than in the congo which was 359 m3 of water consumed by per person. In 2000, The population of brazil and congo were 176 million and 5.2 million, respectively. Water consumption per person in bazil, at 359 m3, was much higher than that in the Congo,at only 8m3, and this could be explained by the fact that brazil had 265 times more irrigated land.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as brazil and congo between 1900 to 2000 years. We can see that in agriculture ar...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... water needs rose significantly between hundred years of period and water consumption w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... and domestic use which was the lowest. and it will be constant no use of water unt...
^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... use of water was approximately 500km3. and in the end of these period in the year ...
^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
..., was much higher than that in the Congo,at only 8m3, and this could be explained b...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52396166134 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39953756428 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434504792332 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3254864132 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236748761651 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11232282452 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764120435863 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166796067849 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861141554982 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as brazil and congo between 1900 to 2000 years. We can see that in agriculture ar...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... water needs rose significantly between hundred years of period and water consumption w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... and domestic use which was the lowest. and it will be constant no use of water unt...
^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... use of water was approximately 500km3. and in the end of these period in the year ...
^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
..., was much higher than that in the Congo,at only 8m3, and this could be explained b...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52396166134 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39953756428 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434504792332 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3254864132 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236748761651 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11232282452 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764120435863 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166796067849 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861141554982 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.