The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The given line graph provides information on water use worldwide by three sectors: agriculture, industry, and domestic, throughout a century between 1900 and 2000. Also, the table compares water consumption in Brazil and DR Congo.
As can be seen, great proportion of water was used in agriculture. This figure rose steadily throughout the period from 500 cubic kilometers in 1900 to 3000 cubic kilometers; nevertheless, it slightly fluctuated between 1960s and 1990s. Water utilization in industry and domestic sectors remained the same at the level of 100 cubic kilometers for a half century between 1900 and 1950; however, water utilization in industry sector increased significantly to over 1000 cubic kilometers at the end of the period. In contrast, there was a minor increase in domestic sector to nearly 400 cubic kilometers in 2000.
With regard to water consumption comparison in Brazil and DR Congo, there is a substantial difference between the countries. Brazil, for instance, is a home for 176 million people, whereas, this figure is substantially less in DR Congo at 5.2 million individuals. There is also a huge difference in agriculture sector in the countries; Brazil possesses 26500 square kilometers of irrigated land compared to only 100 square kilometers in DR Congo. There are dramatic differences between the countries; therefore, there is an immense difference in water consumption. 359 cubic meters of water is used per person in Brazil, while this is 8 cubic meters in DR Congo.
The infographics indicate that the most proportion of water was used in agriculture sector in the last century.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29457364341 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02321606016 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1790016421 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.833333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259480524744 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117750135077 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887042521186 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180259739587 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871013224215 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.