The graph and table below illustrate the usage of the water by various sectors throughout the globe between the year 1900 and 2000, and also the water consumed in two different countries in 2000.
According to the graph, it is manifest that the water used in farming was the maximum amount among other ways of water consumption during this century worldwide. The agriculture used almost 500 km3 sources of water in 1900 and pursued an upward trend up to 2000 and stood on over 3000 km3, while industry and domestic used insignificant amount of water in 1900. They had a rise gradually until 2000, although industry sector had a noticeable growth after 1940 and account for near 1000 km3.
On the other hand, the table revealed that Brazil by large population of 176 million took advantage of 26500 km2 with regard to watering the farmland and 359 m2 water per person consumed in the year 2000. On the flip side, Democratic Republic of Congo with the population of just 5.2 million benefited 100 km2 water with respect to farmland irritation and 8 m3 per person ware consumption in the same year.
To sum up, it is distinctively determined that agriculture sector had a boom in using global water, while industry and household water use encountered a slight rise until 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, to sum up, with regard to, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84090909091 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53886728827 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.8614834557 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.142857143 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217708184009 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112119986157 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064182756523 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14508576152 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398308217882 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.