The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The charts above show the sectoral global water consumption (agriculture, industrial use, and domestic use) and a comparison of water usage in Brazil and the Republic of Congo.
It is clear that global water consumption increase significantly from 1900 to 2000 with agriculture being the largest proportion of water used. It is also obvious that Brazil has a higher consumption of water compared to the Republic of Congo.
In 1900, agriculture accounted for around 500 Km3 water usage while water consumption of industrial and domestic use only has a small amount of the total consumption. By 2000, agriculture still remains as the largest sector for water consumption followed by industrial and domestic sector, respectively.
In 2000, Brazil has a population of 176 million, 30 times larger than Congo with a population of 5.2 million. Brazil and Congo’s water consumption per person is 359m2 and 8m2, respectively. The higher water consumption per person ratio can be explained from the larger irrigated land of Brazil, being 265 larger than Congo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of Brazil, being 265 larger than Congo.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34523809524 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98655338706 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246574467684 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134947684963 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671973553486 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183245522276 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522725486118 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.