The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the usage of water for three different purposes over the world in a century. The table compares the amount of water consumed in Brazil and Congo in year 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the global usage of water increased significantly from 1900 to 2000. In which the water consumption for agriculture were consistently higher than the other two sectors. Meanwhile, each citizens in Brazil – a developed country with huge population consumed a lot more water than those in Congo – a developing country with humble population in the examined year.
In 1900, agriculture activites around the world consumed about 500km3 of water, while less than 100km3 of water was used for domestic and industrial use. These figures rose gradually over the century then reached their peaks in 2000. Among the three sectors, agriculture was the one using the most water. In 2000, around 3000km3 of water was used for agriculture. At the same time the usage for industrial and domestic practices stood at 1000km3 and 200m3 respectively.
On the other hand, water consumption also varied in diffirent countries. Brazil in 265 times bigger than Congo in terms of size and more than 30 times bigger in terms of population. Thus why, the water consumption per Brazillians was much higher than this of Congo citizens. In 2000, the figure recorded in Brazil is 359m3/person, 40 times higher than in Congo (8m3/person).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...humble population in the examined year. In 1900, agriculture activites around th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...30 times bigger in terms of population. Thus why, the water consumption per Brazilli...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68852509628 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53813559322 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0875224044 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7142857143 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174431145525 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747789403178 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056471935807 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114683578663 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240069797961 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.