The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
Summarise the information by reporting the main features and make comparisons.
The charts compare the mount of water used for agriculture industrial and households around the world between 1900 and 2000, and water was used in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo.
It is clear that the need of water using increased significantly between 1900 and 2000, especially, the much lager used in agriculture. We can also see the water consumption considerably higher in Brazil than in Democratic Republic of Congo.
In 1990, there were about 100 km3 water use in industrial and household around the world while the figure for water use in agriculture was higher about 500 km3. After 100 years later, the water use of agriculture jumped rapidly, almost 3,000 km3. In the same time, the global water use for industrial and domestic were significantly lower than agriculturial water use, at about 1,000 km3 and 500 km3 respectively.
By 2000, the population of brazil more 34 times than Democratic Republic of Congo, at about 176 million and 52 million respectively. With a much larger inhabitans than Congo, Brazil’s water consumption each person was 359 m3 while per person in Congo just a slightly consumable at only 8 m3; those could be explained by irrigate area of Brazil had more 265 times than Congo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illion and 52 million respectively. With a much larger inhabitans than Congo, Bra...
^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explained by irrigate area of Brazil had more 265 times than Congo.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03902439024 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81271016797 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.549316504 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191721020865 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107952321016 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503257547946 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132861532261 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532369093857 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.