the graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features anf make comparision where relevant
The line graph illustrates variation in fertility rates of China and the USA over the period from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the percentage of fertility of both china and the USA saw a decrease during this period. The figure for China was lower then the USA almost all of the time surveyed.
In the year 1920, the proportion og fertility of China was higher than the USA, at about 11% and 10% respectively. In the next ten years, the figures for both countries experienced a similar fluctuation trend., before the figure for the USA became higher in the year 1930. There was a downward trend in the figure for the USA to exactly 5% in 1940. Whereas, the figure chor China flutuated until 1940 but later declined significantly to under 5% in 1945.
The USA’s birth rates reached the peak of 20% in 1950 while the figure for China was 15% this year. However, the USA’s birth rates witnessed a sharp decline in the remainder of the period, to about 3% in 2000 while the figure for China fell gradually to around 7%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lower than'?
Suggestion: lower than
...g this period. The figure for China was lower then the USA almost all of the time surveyed...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...for China was lower then the USA almost all of the time surveyed. In the year 1920, the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60109289617 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45299809978 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3351647799 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161180413532 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835055087065 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475856507221 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123611820418 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409132847351 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.