The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. Italso predicts figures for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
A graph provided reveals the information on the comparison between the amount of energy produced and consumed in the US over a 50-year period from 1950 to 2000 and the prediction of those figures for 2025.
Overall, there was a significant extended gap between the patterns for energy’s production and consumption.
It is clear evidence from the chart that since 1950 when the United States used all of 25 units of energy produced, there were steady rises on the amount of energy produced and energy consumed; however, the latter had a faster speed. Accordingly, there was a shortage of energy in the US and they had to imported from other countries to meet their demand. Over a 25-year period saw a fluctuation at the unit of energy’s production, approximately 65 units, meanwhile, the use of it continued growing dramatically to nearly 100 units in 2000.
This figure is under projection to soar sharply to over 125 by 2025. The US government will have to face with great shortage and huge import of energy when the predicted amount of energy produced will increase lightly, stood at 85 units.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82186792794 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593582887701 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0710039613 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250410704649 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120275274457 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917882076617 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170665753025 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968105984745 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.