The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
A glance at the line graph provided reveals the number of diarrhea cases in Mashhad during the period from 1983 to 1992. It can be clearly seen that the highest and lowest figures observed in 1989 and 1992, respectively.
According to the graph, in the first year of the period (1983), some cases stood at 100 and remained unchanged until 1984. Then, there was a slight increase in 1985 and that was followed by another increase, although much steeper in 1986 when cases were 200. 1987 came with a small increase again, and then trend dropped to reach 100 to the same level it was in 1983. In the following year, a number of cases witnessed rapid increase (400), but this was not to last since they dropped again in 1990. After this, figures stayed stable for one year and plunged to zero in 1992.
Overall, the figures of diarrhea cases fluctuated remarkably in the second half of period rather than first half.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A glance at the line graph provided reve...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owest figures observed in 1989 and 1992, respectively. According to the grap...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erved in 1989 and 1992, respectively. According to the graph, in the first yea...
^^^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they dropped again in 1990. After this, figures stayed stable for one year and p...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one year and plunged to zero in 1992. Overall, the figures of diarrhea cases f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60122699387 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17638415111 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638036809816 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.3200570149 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.75 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152757667365 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696594479748 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706682898128 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109337969717 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059833913889 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.