The given kine graph depicts information regarding the spending of people in four countries on buying books for a period of 10 years from 1995 to 2005. The mentioned parameters are Germany, France, Italy and Austria.
It is clear from the data that, German people spent more money on buying books rather than anybody else. They had maintained their top position during the entire period of time. In 1995, they spent almost 80 million USD on purchasing books, that is higher than any other nationalities spending even after the10 yers of time. This figures riced gradually till 1999 where their spendings reached not so high figure of 90 million USD. Then the figures showed declining trend till the year 2003. By the end of the period, the sales went to a staggering figure of 90 million USD.
All the other three nations, France, Italy and Austria showed a similar rising trend during the period of 1990 to 1997. In 1997 France and Italy spent almost same amount of money on books, 55 million USD each. After 1997 the figures showed an opposite trend. France spendings were increased continuously While, Italy's buying pattern showed a decreasing trend. In the end both countries achieved their highest figures in 2005, 62 million USD and 52 million USD respectively. On the contrary Austria spent least amount of money on books in 1995 (30 million USD), but achieved third position at the end with the figures of 62 million USD.
In conclusion, it is evident from the chart that, books were very popular among Germans. Whereas, Austrians were least interested in buying books but at end they improved their position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ed their top position during the entire period of time. In 1995, they spent almost 80 million ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... figures riced gradually till 1999 where their spendings reached not so high figu...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of money on books, 55 million USD each. After 1997 the figures showed an opposite tre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highest figures in 2005, 62 million USD and 52 million USD respectively. On the ...
^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...D respectively. On the contrary Austria spent least amount of money on books in 1995 30 mil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, then, third, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34793667112 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541818181818 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5068816888 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.375 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265188157349 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905295878625 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803825156048 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165610217278 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982652846715 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.