The line graph illustrates the average CO2 emissions on average per person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007. Units are measured in metric tonnes. The CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal showed a steady but significant rise over the period, while the remaining two experienced a downward trend.
In 1967, the CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal were nearly 4.5 metric tonnes and 1 metric tonnes respectively. The CO2 emissions of Italy was increased sharply throughout the period and remains constant from 1997 to 2007.Furthermore, it exceeds the amount of CO2 emissions of Sweden in 1990 and reached almost 7.5 metric tonnes at the end of the period.In the mean time,the CO2 emissions in the Portugal grew to 3 metric tonnes in 1997, and experienced a rapid surge to more than 5 metric tonnes and continued with slightly increase to 5.2 metric tonnes in 2007.
The amount of CO2 emissions of Sweden reached its peak at 10.5 metric tonnes in 1997 and began from 9 metric tonnes in 1967 and declined to 5 metric tonnes in 2007. The CO2 emissions of UK(11 metric tonnes) was the highest among these four countries. However, it dramatically declined to 8.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
In conclusion, it is clear that the UK produced the largest amount of gas while Sweden and Portugal were jointly produced the lowest amount of gas
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...r different countries from 1967 to 2007.Units are measured in metric tonnes.The CO2 ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...007.Units are measured in metric tonnes.The CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portuga...
^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts are measured in metric tonnes.The CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal show...
^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...ady but significant rise over the period,while the remaining two experienced a downwar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tonnes and 1 metric tonnes respectively.The CO2 emissions of Italy was increased sh...
^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
... and remains constant from 1997 to 2007.Furthermore,it exceeds the amount of CO2 emissions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...s constant from 1997 to 2007.Furthermore,it exceeds the amount of CO2 emissions of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... metric tonnes at the end of the period.In the mean time,the CO2 emissions in the ...
^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...t the end of the period.In the mean time,the CO2 emissions in the Portugal grew to 3...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...and declined to 5 metric tonnes in 2007.The CO2 emissions of UK11 metric tonnes was...
^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... the highest among these four countries.However,it dramatically declined to 8.5 metric ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ghest among these four countries.However,it dramatically declined to 8.5 metric ton...
^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... metric tonnes in 2007. In conclusion,it is clear that the UK produced the large...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0402941354 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486363636364 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 22.4926829268 245% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 149.603434118 43.030603864 348% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 280.5 112.824112599 249% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.0 22.9334400587 240% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.75 5.23603664747 263% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192665468081 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138352789537 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923693092416 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138352789537 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923693092416 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.1 13.2329268293 227% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 61.2550243902 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 10.3012195122 229% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 10.9970731707 218% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.