The chart compares the quantities of CO2 emissions per capita in four different nations during 1967 and 2007.
It is clear that the UK people by far produced the highest amount of CO2. In addition, while the amounts of CO2 emissions in the UK and Sweden decreased during the research period, the figures for Portugal and Italy gradually went up.
In 1967, almost 11 metric tonnes of CO2 were produced by people living in the UK, followed by Sweden individuals, at nearly 9 metric tonnes. While Portugese only emitted 1 metric tonnes of CO2, Italian produced four times more, at around 4 metric tonnes. During 1977, there was a dramatic rise in the amount of CO2 emissions in Sweden, to more than 10 metric tonnes per person. By contrast, England's figure had a slight decline to the same level as Sweden.
In 2007, while the amount of CO2 emissions in Sweden decreased to only 5 metric tonnes, the number of CO2 emitted by Italian rose to nearly 8 metric tonnes and became the second highest figure in the graph. Meanwhile, England remained the country with highest amount of CO2 emissions per capita, at 9 metric tonnes, compared to 5 metric tonnes of CO2 emitted by Italian.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...Meanwhile, England remained the country with highest amount of CO2 emissions per capita, at ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75242718447 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40118600318 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.287853146 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164934550406 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876153342161 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471856569211 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123453097614 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188787663446 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.