The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph reveals information about the average of carbon dioxide (CO2) waste by human individually in four main countries which are United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal over the period of 1967 to 2007. Overall, the most increased CO2 emissions happened in Portugal and on contrary, in Sweden, it decreased the most even though there was a rise in 1997.
On of the countries that declined their CO2 produce is the United Kingdom. In the first year, there were almost 11 tons which were wasted by each person then it went down gradually during the period by around 2 metric tons. Likewise, CO2 disposal in Sweden was initially approximately 9 tons. After this, it climbed dramatically to above 10 tons in 1997, before went down significantly over the next three years to reach almost 5 tons.
On the other hand, there was a rise of CO2 which went up steadily from approximately 4 tons in 1967 to above 7 tons in 2007 in Italy. Throughout the time, the wasting CO2 in Portugal also grew in a considerable, having to around 5 tons from about 1 tons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the other hand, there was a rise of CO2 which went up steadily from approxim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68817204301 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61774408867 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6711455926 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208475730115 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976759553341 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982002918247 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154133334804 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109993528277 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.