The stipulates line chart illustrates the proportion of CO2 emissions per individual in 4 different nations over a period of 5 decades, from 1967 to 2007. The mentioned parameters are UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.
It is clear from the diagram that UK and Sweden showed a declining trend in carbon dioxide emissions during the period. United Kingdom's CO2 emissions was very high (11metric tonnes) in 1967. While Sweden's figure was just over 8 million tonnes. At some point (1977) Sweden's emission rate almost touched UK's level, almost 11 metric tonnes. Somehow Sweden managed to reduce this hazardous emission level almost by half compared to their initial figures and achieved their lowest record figurers in 2007, which was 5.5 metric tonnes. Whereas UK only managed to reduce a mere 2.5 metric tonnes over the 5 decades time.
On the other hand, carbon dioxide discharge rate was on the rise in Italy and Portugal over the course of mentioned period. Portugal's 1967 venting rate was very low (1 metric tonne) as compared to their counter parts. while Italy's rate was bit high, just over 4 metric tonnes. Both countries transmission rate was at steady during the last decade from 1997 to 2007, 6.8 metric tonnes and 5.6 metric tonnes respectively.
In conclusion, UK and Sweden managed to reduce their CO2 emission to a certain level.But Sweden achieved a great improvement during the time. whereas other two countries figures were gradually increased without any fluctuations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... emissions was very high 11metric tonnes in 1967. While Swedens figure was just o...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...was very high 11metric tonnes in 1967. While Swedens figure was just over 8 million ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s in 2007, which was 5.5 metric tonnes. Whereas UK only managed to reduce a mere 2.5 me...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...nne as compared to their counter parts. while Italys rate was bit high, just over 4 m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...ir counter parts. while Italys rate was bit high, just over 4 metric tonnes. Both c...
^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...t high, just over 4 metric tonnes. Both countries transmission rate was at steady during ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...e their CO2 emission to a certain level.But Sweden achieved a great improvement dur...
^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ed a great improvement during the time. whereas other two countries figures were gradua...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed a great improvement during the time. whereas other two countries figures were gradua...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50766239259 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1344678575 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7142857143 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158800400048 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669785002903 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478662483002 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104312484273 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353392128408 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.