The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
The line chart illustrates the quantity of world food and oil prices were changed over a 11 year-period.
It is clear that the number of both food price index and average oil price were on a considerable increase. Nevertheless, the trend of both commodities was very similar and the correlation got at high percentage ( 93,6% ) .
In 2000, the average oil price stood at nearly $25 per barrel while food price index just got at under 90 points. After four years, the cost of both commodities remained relatively stable, until from 2004 to 2007, there was a slightly increase between two commodities. By 2007, the average oil price had more than doubled to nearly $60 per barrel and world food price rise to 130 points.
Between 2008 and 2011, both commodities prices had a significant increase, the cost of food index peaked at 230 points and average oil reached at $130 per barrel between 2008 and 2009. A dramatic decrease of average oil price was witnessed in 2009 before this commodity rising to $100 per barrel in 2011. At the same time the price of food also dropped sharply in 2009 and then stood at striking level at 240 points in 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart illustrates the quantity ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d food and oil prices were changed over a 11 year-period. It is cle...
^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food and oil prices were changed over a 11 year-period. It is clear...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were changed over a 11 year-period. It is clear that the number of both food...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the correlation got at high percentage 93,6% . In 2000, the ave...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orrelation got at high percentage 93,6% . In 2000, the average oi...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rrelation got at high percentage 93,6% . In 2000, the average oil...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion got at high percentage 93,6% . In 2000, the average oil price...
^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ble, until from 2004 to 2007, there was a slightly increase between two commodities. By 2007, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... world food price rise to 130 points. Between 2008 and 2011, both co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67661691542 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50219000245 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3467745728 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280286976942 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134667553915 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700040884063 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18345080783 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319852153092 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.