The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.
The graph below compares the amounts of three kinds of spreads (Margarine, Low fat and spreads and Butter) that were consumed between 1981 and 2007. Overall what stands out from the graph is that the consumption amount of Margarine and Butter dropped significantly, whereas the level went up markedly for Low fat and spreads over the time frame mentioned in the question. The units are measured in grams.
Looking at the details, there were similar trends on the consumptions amount for both Margarine and butter. With regards to the use of butter, it stood at around 141 grams in the year 1981. Then, the following years the amount increased sharply to just under 160 grams. However, there were rapid decline to around 50 grams at the end of the period. Similarly, beginning the period at approximately 90 grams, 1996 to 2001 witnessed some fluctuations which was eventually followed by dramatic decrease in the year 2007.
On the other hand, the opposite course was noticed for low fat and spreads which meant that it started at around 15 grams in 1996 followed by sudden rise rocketing to just over 80 grams in 2001. Next, the trend declined steadily to 65 grams in the final years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, similarly, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45683614213 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593137254902 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8944819147 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198982751971 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689149989323 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100415627069 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138591750077 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133068298827 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.