The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph below provides information on the amounts of fish, chicken, beef and lamp consumed weekly by a person in a particular European country from 1979 to 2004, a period of 25 years. A glance at the graphs reveals that the consumption of chicken increased remarkably over the time, whereas fish was not as preferred by people as the three different types of meat.
Now, turning to the details, in 1979, beef was by far the most popular of these foods, each person ate about 225 grams chicken weekly. Besides, lamb and chicken were consumed in nearly similar quantities (around 150 grams per person per week), while that of fish just over 50 grams in this year.
However, during this period, the consumption of beef and lamp declined significantly to approximately 100 grams and well-over 50 grams successively. In addition, that of fish also observed a slight downward trend to reach around 50 grams at the end of the period.
On the other hand, the graph shows a considerable growth of chicken consumption, which overtook that of lamb in 1800, and that of beef in 1989. By 2004, it eventually reached its peak about 250 grams weekly per person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fish just over 50 grams in this year. However, during this period, the consump...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 50 grams at the end of the period. On the other hand, the graph shows a con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7960199005 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59166258082 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5490418296 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147414375774 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677639131464 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656744493693 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951885746074 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090279416555 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.