The stipulated line chart depicts pollution level in city of London in a span of four and a half centuries from 1550 to 2000. The mentioned parameters are sulfur dioxide and smoke.
It is clear from the graph is that during the 15nth century, the air was very clear and there was no sign of pollutants like sulfur dioxide and smoke. But in 1580 onward the figures showed some signs of pollution kick off with a very little figure 1 micrograms of sulfur dioxide per cubic meter. Then it was gradually increased and reached not so high. Indicator of 800 micro grams per cubic meter in 1725. After that it showed some fluctuations till the year of 1850, where it peaked with a second level of sulfur content(900 micrograms /cubicmeters). From 1851,the indicators showed a sign of decline of sulfur content in the city except in 1880, in the end of millennium it reached the same point where all it started (almost 0).
The presence of smoke in the air also showed the similar trend. The earlier millennia witnessed no smoke at all just the clear air. After some perood,it also showed some presence in the atmosphere from the year 1850 to be exact. It indicated a slow rise for almost 3 centuries til 1880, where it showed a figure 450 micrograms per cubic meters. After this, the indicator showed sign of fall and severe downward fluctuations for almost 40 years.
In conclusion, there is an increasing trend for a period of 3 millenniums but the sulfur dioxide presence was very high as compared to smoke. At the end both figures expressed same level at 0point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is clear from the graph is that during the 15nth century, the air was very clea...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...l just the clear air. After some perood,it also showed some presence in the atmosp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67028985507 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49387771672 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503623188406 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2355833393 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0761095957054 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274579777697 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030140552586 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0391472053824 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393322983281 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.