The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The line graph illustrates the wheat export trends in Australia, Canada and European Community during the period between 1985 and 1990.
It is obvious from the line graph that Canada was the dominating country in the amount of exported wheat until the late 1988 when being exceeded by European Community.
Over 5-year period, the level of exported wheat in Canada experienced some dramatic fluctuation. After a slight decrease from 1985 to 1986, it jumped at high speed and reached the peak of 25 millions of tones in 1988. Unpredictably, in the next year, it fell to the bottom of nearly 15 millions of tones and then recovered in 1990.
It is worth noticing that the wheat export trends of Australia and European Community had opposite tendency. Apart from a reduction from 1985 to 1986, the amount of exported wheat in Australia maintained the stability with 15 millions of tones in the next 2 years before increasing rapidly to 21 millions of tones in 1990. By contrast, wheat export level in European Community reached the top with 16 millions of tones in 1986, which is followed by a steady fall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '25 million'.
Suggestion: 25 million
...d at high speed and reached the peak of 25 millions of tones in 1988. Unpredictably, in the ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...t year, it fell to the bottom of nearly 15 millions of tones and then recovered in 1990. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...Australia maintained the stability with 15 millions of tones in the next 2 years before increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '21 million'.
Suggestion: 21 million
...xt 2 years before increasing rapidly to 21 millions of tones in 1990. By contrast, wheat expor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '16 million'.
Suggestion: 16 million
...European Community reached the top with 16 millions of tones in 1986, which is followed by a s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86243386243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57365940639 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497354497354 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4859126979 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996882439746 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543627932103 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367029578513 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723062392817 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143996196802 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.