The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph indicates the total amount of air pollutants as well as detrimental substances stemming from 3 certain contributing factors between 1990 and 2005 in the UK, measured in million tons.
Overall, it is evident that the nation less suffered from air pollution throughout the period, compared to it did in 1999. Additionally, industry was the major contributing factor over this time interval.
Turning into detail, starting at 7 million tons in 1990, total pollutants kept declining significantly by the year of 1999. Although the level of modification was less clear, its downward trend was still visible throughout the remainders of the period, with an over-3-million-ton value in 2005. Likewise, the figure for industry decreased considerably from about 5.5 million tons to exactly 2 million tons in 2005, but still maintained its first rank among 3 surveyed categories.
In contrast, slighter levels of change were witnessed in two remaining items. Indeed, after several year of fluctuation, pollutants stemming from industry almost remained stable at around 1 million tons over the period. Having the same starting point, the number for household pollutants eventually declined to below 0.5 million tons in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...en 1990 and 2005 in the UK, measured in million tons. Overall, it is evident that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'several years'.
Suggestion: several years
...d in two remaining items. Indeed, after several year of fluctuation, pollutants stemming fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ined to below 0.5 million tons in 2005.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, still, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51041666667 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99065384434 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6226434101 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144381696246 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637188763904 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056793782732 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10337453921 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515110576237 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.