The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The stipulated line chart depict the information regarding the number of complaints made in relation to sound pollution to Environmental Health authorities in the Newtown metropolis in period of 16 years from 1980 to 1996. The mentioned parameters are road works, traffic noise, factories, domestic or household.

It is clear from the diagram that, road works constitutes more complaints than any other factors. Road works and traffic noise showed almost similar pattern, in the year 1980 there were 500 and 300 complaints respectively. Both complaint factors were reduce to its minimum during 1986 - 1988 period, which is 400 and 200 complaints. There was significant complaints against road work noises from 1988 to 1996 and its reached at peak with 1200 companies at the end of the era. Likewise traffic noise also showed the same trend but in a different level.

Complaints against factories and households showed a declining trend despite it's initial high number of complaints. In 1980, there was 400 and 610 disputes raised against these two annoying factors. However after the 16 years of time the industry fuss figures were reduced to a not so low as level of 650 complaints. while domestic disturbances reduced drastically and reached below deck figure of 100 complaints.

In conclusion, disturbances relating to transport sector showed a rising trend. While noise controversies in connection with industry and domestic sector reduced to a minimum during the time.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...spectively. Both complaint factors were reduce to its minimum during 1986 - 1988 perio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...h 1200 companies at the end of the era. Likewise traffic noise also showed the same tren...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sed against these two annoying factors. However after the 16 years of time the industry...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... after the 16 years of time the industry fuss figures were reduced to a not so lo...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... not so low as level of 650 complaints. while domestic disturbances reduced drastical...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84131072349 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7594129152 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178354297527 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604825447919 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658673456884 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109559194573 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643443269859 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.