The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The amount of refferals recieved from January to June in 2011 , by the Tourist Information Office in one city , showcases by the given linear graph.
At a glance the graph reveals a surge in personal and telephone enquiries while the enquiries by letters have declined with the time. Eventhough the in person referrals encountered the lowest number and letter/email enquiries showed a higher number than in person referrals by January, there is a significant reversal pattern of above two types by June.
Simultaneously, in person refferals have been started at the lowest number between 400-600 while letter/email and telephone enquiries taken up relatively higher numbers of 600-800 and 800-1000 respectively. Even if the starting numbers were like that , By June , in person refferals were grown upto 1800-2000. On the other hand telephone enquiries also show acontinuous growth with slight fluctuations until June while letter/email enquiries have shown a steady pattern until March but declined between march to June which has shown a negative growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ls recieved from January to June in 2011 , by the Tourist Information Office in on...
^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e Tourist Information Office in one city , showcases by the given linear graph. ...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n if the starting numbers were like that , By June , in person refferals were grow...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tarting numbers were like that , By June , in person refferals were grown upto 180...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45731707317 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92551500399 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1245670527 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.166666667 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149848342979 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859932490788 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703440132274 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134299147939 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747479889212 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.