The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph compares the number of foreign visitors to types of different places in European country from 1987 to 2007.
In general terms, there was significant increase in the number of foregin travelers to the coast, the mountains and the lakes in European. Besides, the coast was always the most popular choice of visitors, except for the year 2002.
It is clear from the line graph show that between 1987 to 2007, there was a total of 40 thousands to the coast. In 1987, this figure dropped slightly to 35 thousands and then to reached a peak nearly 75 thousands in 2007. On the other hand, the number of travelers to the lakes was 10 thousands in 1987. After, this figure rose dramatically frim 1987 to 2002 and reached a peak at around 75 thousands in 2002. As can be seen, the lakes is a popular choice of foreign visitors in 2002.
In contracst, there was a total of 20 thousands to the mountains. This figure for the number of travelers to the mountains fluctuated wildly before ending at approximately 35 thousands in 2007. However, it is noticeable that the mountains and the lakes were equal the number of overseas visitors in 1992.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, then, except for, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64215686275 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5383401852 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46568627451 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7525528092 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265167241589 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108367249119 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112347421993 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188278214378 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130702453169 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.