The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting the particular Caribbean between 2010&2017.
The line graph compares the information about how many visitors have visited the Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
By analysing data, at the beginning of the period people interested to stay on the island was at 0.7 million. Whereas, visitors were staying on ships was below 0.5 million. From 2011 to 2015 staying on the Island visitors were dramatically augmented, it was at 0.7 to 1.5 million tourists. In 2012 the number of tourists was alleviated on cruise ships, it was at least a proportion of 0.2 million only, but after that, it rose significantly till to 2017 at 2 million of visitors. However, the number of tourists who stayed on the island was 1.5 million of visitors.
In addition, by analysing further data the total amount of visitors who had visited the Caribbean island was a million people in 2010. After that, this trend was rapidly increased till to the end of the period by 3.5 million of visited
Overall, it is clear from the graph that over time staying on the island was less popular than saying on cruise ships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... stay on the island was at 0.7 million. Whereas, visitors were staying on ships was bel...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the period by 3.5 million of visited Overall, it is clear from the graph that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75956284153 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49903083726 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9412913602 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177462223365 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955110981798 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921221448494 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136462206974 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103141928571 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.