The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graphs give information about the amount of tourism visitors in several Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017. Overall, the number of tourists that visited the islands increased over eight years’ periods.

In 2010, there were 1 million visitors in Caribbean Islands. The number of tourists who visited Caribbean Island slowly rose until 2015 and remained steady in 2016 with 2.75 million tourists visited the Island. It increased dramatically just in one year with 3.5 million people visited the islands in 2017.

By Looking at the classification of the vacation, they were separated by two option of stayed, staying in island and staying on cruise ships. In 2010, there are 0.75 million people chose to stay on island and for the rest, 0.25 million people chose to stay on cruise ships. The staying on islands option was the most favorable staying option until 2015. In 2016, there are 1.5 million tourists who stayed on cruise ships and 1.25 million people stayed on islands. The number of visitors that stayed on cruise ships reached the peak in 2017 by 2 million people, the number of people who stayed on island is considered stable since 2013 with 1.5 million people.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96984924623 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31774352596 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477386934673 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8863118243 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187105924202 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100839596652 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689888576941 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187458856052 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872913198018 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.