The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the quantities of UK commodities transported on four different transportation between 1974 and 2002.
It is clear that road stood out as being utilized for moving goods far more than the others, while those of pipeline was trivial. Overall, almost all of the figures for transportation increased moderately, with the except for an oscillation in commodities transported by rail.
As is observed, the largest amount of goods was carried by road at roughly 70 million tones in 1974. However, the data of pipeline was sharply lower at merely 5 million tones. Moreover, commodities carried by rail, which was fairly equal to those of water at approximately 40 million tones.
In 2001, the amount of goods witnessed a soar to roughly 100 million tones, despite of hitting a low in 1982. Over the period shown, those of water climbed exponentially to about 60 million tones, whereas the data of rail stayed remain at 1974 figure. Furthermore, the growth of commodities transported by pipeline was particularly noticeable between 1974 and 2002, during which time, the data of pipeline was almost four-fold bigger at approximately 20 million tones
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f pipeline was trivial. Overall, almost all of the figures for transportation increased mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96829640917 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.998498468 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174759328055 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894096030122 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133594396849 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165637021874 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166619300298 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.