The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart compares the numbers of products delivered by four different means of transport over the period of 28 years in the UK.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that the transportation on road, water and pipeline increased over the years while rail transport became less common. Delivering goods by road had always been the most popular choice.
In 1974, goods transported in the UK by road, water and pipeline were 70, 39 and 5 million (m) tonnes respectively. 1980 saw a big improvement in water (58m) and pipeline (18m) transports while the number of goods transported by road remained the mostly the same. 22 years later, in 2002, road, water and pipeline transports all significantly increased with 99m, 63m and 21m tonnes of goods were delivered.
On the other hand, rail transport stayed steady at around 40m tonnes between 1974 and 1978. Then it went down gradually over the next few years before increasing again in 1986. The rail transport didn't see much significant improvement in the next years. The number of goods transported stood at 41m tonnes in 2002, which was a marginal increase in comparison to 28 years ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the mostly the'. Did you mean 'mostly the'?
Suggestion: mostly the
...r of goods transported by road remained the mostly the same. 22 years later, in 2002, road, wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...asing again in 1986. The rail transport didnt see much significant improvement in the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68416702241 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7951384786 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224467654878 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101259255806 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498928298982 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144740800605 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028423162366 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.