The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The line graph provides the information about amount of money spend in mobile phones and landline services in the whole year from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, annual expenditure on mobile phones services was gradually increasing throughout the period, however, it was totally opposite with residential phone services, where its graph was significantly declining with time.Moreover, they both were showng minute fluctuations at some periods of time .\
In 2001, people used more residential phone services and the budget was around 700 dollar while for mobile phones it was 200 dollars. In 2002,the usage of mobile phone services slightly grew , while that of residential phone services started declining. In the successive years mobile phone services rapidly growing whereas the residential phone services dropped with time
Interstingly, in 2006, the expenditure on both the services were equal , was around 500 dollars . However, in 2010 , the budget on mobile phone services was around 800 dollars, while that of residential phones was about 400 dollars, almost halved from cell phones

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...h was significantly declining with time.Moreover, they both were showng minute fluctuat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... declining with time.Moreover, they both were showng minute fluctuations at some ...
^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ute fluctuations at some periods of time .\ In 2001, people used more residential...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... services and the budget was around 700 dollar while for mobile phones it was 200 doll...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e of mobile phone services slightly grew , while that of residential phone service...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dential phone services dropped with time Interstingly, in 2006, the expenditure o...
^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...enditure on both the services were equal , was around 500 dollars . However, in 20...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ices were equal , was around 500 dollars . However, in 2010 , the budget on mobile...
^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as around 500 dollars . However, in 2010 , the budget on mobile phone services was...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5696969697 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75158966322 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.837276178 43.030603864 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 183.8 112.824112599 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283458885582 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188631096515 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00885619870114 0.0843802449381 10% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192389219879 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253770164247 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.2329268293 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.