the graph shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph compares the amount of fish and three other kinds of meat including chicken, beef and lamb consumed in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, fish was the least commonly used food throughout the period shown. The amount of beef and lamb saw a decrease while the figure for chicken experienced a fluctuating increase.
In the year 1979, the amount of beef eaten was the highest, at about 220 grams per person per week. The figure for lamb and chicken was lower, at exact 150 and under 150 grams respectively. People in the country ate only about 70 grams of fish per week, which was the lowest figure among 4 kinds.
From 1979 to 2004, there was a significant increase, despite some fluctuations, in the amount of chicken consumed to under 250 grams. By contrast, the figure for beef and lamb witnessed a considerable decline to about 100 and around 70 grams in the year 2004. The amount of fish consumption fell steadily to under 50 grams throughout the period, a fall of about 20 in 25 years
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46577833439 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6126808082 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186445463038 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823793772658 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100413054097 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13992187673 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124919581801 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.