The graph shows the differences in wheat exports over 3 different areas.
The line graph depicts the information about the quantity of wheat exported (in millions of tonnes) by Australia, Canada and European community from 1985 to 1990.
A quick look on graph makes it lucid that, huge quantity of wheat exported by European community as compared to Australia and Canada, with the passage of given years.
According to the given data it is clear that, roughly 19 millions of tonnes wheat exported by Canada in 1985 and related figure went down to nearly 17 in 1986. From 1986 to 1988, it rose significantly to 25 and reached at peak point. In the next year (1989), it dropped significantly to below 15. In 1990, it grew rapidly to just below 20 millions of tonnes. Nevertheless, in the initial year (1985), 15 millions of tonnes wheat imported by others countries from Australia. It inclined slowly to nearly 16 in 1986. From 1986 to 1989, it went down moderately to about 9 millions of tonnes which remained stable till 1990.
In contrast, European community exported approximately 17 millions of tonnes wheat to other countries in 1985. In 1986, it dropped gradually to nearly 14. In the next year (1987), it inclined insignificantly to 15 millions of tonnes which remained stagnant till 1988. Between 1988 and 1990, it rose quickly to just over 20.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '19 million'.
Suggestion: 19 million
...he given data it is clear that, roughly 19 millions of tonnes wheat exported by Canada in 1985...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
... In 1990, it grew rapidly to just below 20 millions of tonnes. Nevertheless, in the initial ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...Nevertheless, in the initial year 1985, 15 millions of tonnes wheat imported by others countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
... 1989, it went down moderately to about 9 millions of tonnes which remained stable till 1990....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
...ropean community exported approximately 17 millions of tonnes wheat to other countries in 1985...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...986, it dropped gradually to nearly 14. In the next year 1987, it inclined insign...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to nearly 14. In the next year 1987, it inclined insignificantly to 15 millions ...
^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...r 1987, it inclined insignificantly to 15 millions of tonnes which remained stagnant till 198...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8401826484 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67143971412 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488584474886 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3192360623 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5384615385 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109679219225 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416728277904 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499119267768 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950382877597 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356124905271 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.