The two line graphs illustarte how treatment affected the survival rates in female patients suffering from two types of cancer, namely alimentary tract cancer and lymphosarcoma.
Overall, the percentages of surviving in both cancers were all trending down and plateued from the third year to the firth year from diagnosis, except that the surviving rate of Lymphosarcoma in the treatment group was significantly declined to 0%.
With regards to Alimentary tract cancer, female patients with treatment survived in the first year from diagnosis accounted for about 75%, comparing to around 40% without treatment. Between the second and the fifth year, the suriving percentage of treatment group slowly and steadily decreased and reached to the level of 50% in the fourth year, and surprisingly, the figure gently increased at end of the graph span. In contrast, the non-treatment group observed a bigger decline to approximately 15%.
Looking at lymphosarcoma, both treatment and non-treatment group observed a dramatic fall, at approximately 40% in the first year after cancer diagnosis, despite treatment group had a slighly better figure. Since then, the surviving precentage within female patients who underwent treament continued to drop reaching zero. Meanwhile, without treatment, the figures had slower rate of declining and maintained the level of 20% between the third and the fifth year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents suffering from two types of cancer, namely alimentary tract cancer and lymph...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57943925234 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96195340312 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560747663551 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6421883875 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.25 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293079285226 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135432086821 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113295501892 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204747666164 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113515831188 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.