The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.
The bar graphs illustrates how many men and women worked in six different sectors in the Republic of Freedonia between 1975 and 1995.
It is clear that in 1975 all six employment sectors are dominated by men. Some significant changes could be seen in three out of six sectors in the following two decades.
In 1975, 250,000 women worked in communications compared to 300,000 of men and there were total 500,000 female and 700,000 male workers in retail sale. However, In 1995, the number of female communication and wholesale and retail trade employees increased significantly to 600,000 and 800,000 respectively, but the figures for male workers in the two sectors hardly changed. Similarly, female bankers are closing the gap with a three-fold growth in employment, making the numbers of employees in finance fairly equal in gender terms.
Some striking changes are not seen in the remaining sectors. Men were still overrepresented in contrast to women in manufacturing and public sector (non-defence) with the respective gender employment inequalities of 400,000 and 200,000 workers in both 1975 and 1995. The same goes for the public sector (defence) where there were still 200,000 more men workers than their counterparts of the opposite sex in 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar graphs illustrates how many men and women worked in six di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sectors in the following two decades. In 1975, 250,000 women worked in communi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, still, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24257425743 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85995116302 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6220835125 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290636737246 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119673701419 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748838347614 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177155704319 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498646940925 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.