The pie charts illustrates the percentage of annual spending on seven categories ( food, cars, petrol, restaurants, furnitures, computers and books ) in the year of 1971 and 2001 in the UK.
Overall, composition of consumption varied significantly over a span of thirty years. The dominant spending on food in 1971 was superseded by cars in 2001.
Looking from the first pie chart of 2001, it is apparent that cars composed 43% of yearly expenditure. Spending on food and restaurants were the same section of 14%. However, food used to be the major expense in 1971, which comprised 44% of annual spending. Spending on books was a negligible 1% of total family expenditure, which was only one sixth of the spending on books in 1971.
Turning to the second pie graph of 1971, spending on cars was merely 22% of yearly expense, which was half of the expenditure on cars in 2001. Besides, expense on computers was 2% that was one sixth of the same spending in 2001. By contrast, spending on furnitures and petrol did not change too much over the period, which was 9% and 10% respectively in 1971 and 8% and 8% respectively in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of annual spending on seven categories food, cars, petrol, restaurants, furnitu...
^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aurants, furnitures, computers and books in the year of 1971 and 2001 in the UK. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7806122449 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78256811946 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.80716016 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177550433143 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807691655307 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046823918985 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120450020006 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229096904087 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.