The pie chart gives information about the expenditure of people in the UK on seven different products in two different years 1971 and 2001.
Overall, it can be seen that in 1971 people in the UK had spent a major proportion of their money on food, while in 2001, after three decades their preference changed and in this year the highest percentage of money they spent on cars .
The expenditure on food by people in UK was 44% in 1971, however this figure dropped to one third (14%) in the year of 2001. Similarly, the spending on book also reduced significantly from 6% to 1% during the period. But the proportion of money spent on petrol and furniture were almost same in both years.
On the other hand, the percentage of money spent on cars almost doubled in 2001 comparing to 1971,from 22% to 43%. The same trend shows in the case of money had spent in restaurants, in 1971 it was 7% after three decades it doubled to 14% in 2001. Finally, the money expenses on computer by the people UK increased dramatically in 2001 (12%) , when compared to 1971 figure (2%), an increase of 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout the expenditure of people in the UK on seven different products in two diffe...
^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rall, it can be seen that in 1971 people in the UK had spent a major proportion o...
^^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t percentage of money they spent on cars . The expenditure on food by people i...
^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nding on book also reduced significantly from 6% to 1% during the period. But the...
^^
Line 6, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey expenses on computer by the people UK increased dramatically in 2001 12% , whe...
^^
Line 6, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e UK increased dramatically in 2001 12% , when compared to 1971 figure 2%, an inc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5076142132 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5144917219 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532994923858 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5184946316 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209930440703 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952534850692 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508767307904 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133250932096 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228705276482 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.