The graphs show the percentage of loans in different categories in 2 libraries between 1980 and 2010, with predicted figures for 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart describes the proportion of loans in various types of material in two libraries over a period of 40 years, starting from 1980.
In general. It is clear that demand for reading fiction is increasingly going up whereas the figure of nonfiction is decreasing constantly in library A throughout these years. An opposite trend can be witnessed in library B in the same period. Beside this, the multimedia products loanned frequently account for the smallest rate among three types of documents in both two libraries.
Regarding changes in library A, in the beginning of 1980s, many readers tend to choose more non-fiction works with a percentage that stood at above 450%, in comparison with just above 40% of fiction. However; the proportion of loans in fiction surpassed that in the number of non-fiction loans from the 1990s and this is predicted to remain their increase over many following decades. In addition, there is a fluctuation in loans of dvds before being followed by a considerable plummet after 2010.
Looking at the data collected in library B, while the number of non-fiction books chosen by readers is soaring rapidly from 1980 until 2020 as a prediction, a constant drop is regarded in fiction books throughout this period, which can hit the nadir of 30% in 2020. The loan in multimedia ones like CD/DVD disks marginally increased from 1980 to 1990 before going down to roughly 5% in 2020.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...site trend can be witnessed in library B in the same period. Beside this, the mul...
^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...parison with just above 40% of fiction. However; the proportion of loans in fiction sur...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... of 30% in 2020. The loan in multimedia ones like CD/DVD disks marginally increased ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73719487435 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610878661088 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6349007653 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.777777778 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169659147392 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627345533052 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026765858477 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999939394061 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166158862799 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.