Levels of unemloyment in 3 countries
The presnted line chart illustrates the difference in the percentage of people who had no job in 3 countries, namely A, B and C from 2004-2008.
In general, there were vary trend in the proportion of unemployment in 3 each countries. While the number of unemployment in country C witnessed a sharp increase, the other had fluctuation.
In 2004, the levels of people had no job in coutry B started at approxiamately 3%, followed by nearly 2% in coutry A, finally country C at 0,75 %. From 2004 to 2005, there were a dramatic rise in the percentage of unemployment in country A, at over 4% and a moderately growth in country C, at 1%. By contrast, the proportion in country B dropped to 2,25%.
Over the period 2005 to 2007, the number of people had no job in country C had a spectacular and stayed at above 5%. Meanwhile, both of the proportion in country A and C experienced a fluctuation, at 3,75% and 1,95% respectively. In the last year, the levels of unemploymen in 3 countries saw a steed increase in its number which reached at peak, namely 4,5% in country A, 2,95% in country B and nearly 6% in country C.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
...from 2004-2008. In general, there were vary trend in the proportion of unemployment...
^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('moderately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...employment in country A, at over 4% and a moderately growth in country C, at 1%. By contrast, the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50246305419 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02788844244 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6757564491 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27043060048 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124284779682 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103131736093 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152717307937 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121431602041 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.