The line chart illustrates the average figure for the UK commuters travelling daily by car, bus or train in millions, from 1970 to 2030.
The line chart illustrates the average figure for the UK commuters travelling daily by car, bus or train in millions, from 1970 to 2030.
It can be see from the chart that car is by far the most popular vehicle among the 3 types of transport, and travelling by train witnesses an upward trend during the surveyed period.
In 1970, Car was the most chosen vehicle with around 5 million people, followed by bus and train with approximately 4 and 2 million respectively.It was noticeable the number of car and train’s travellers experienced the same upward trend, whereas that number of bus became unpopular and dropped slightly year by year.
It is predicted that people travelling by car will continue to increase from 2020 and reach a peak of nearly 9 million in 2030. Meanwhile, commuters going by train will overtake that figure for bus and reach at around 5 millions, whereas those of bus decreased to 3 millions at the end of the survey.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ward trend during the surveyed period. In 1970, Car was the most chosen vehicle...
^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n people, followed by bus and train with approximately 4 and 2 million respective...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...roximately 4 and 2 million respectively.It was noticeable the number of car and t...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectively.It was noticeable the number of car and train's travellers experien...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o increase from 2020 and reach a peak of nearly 9 million in 2030. Meanwhile, com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80606060606 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76029835627 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8395369832 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.6 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529817839532 0.215688989381 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.332868154399 0.103423049105 322% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.334291940089 0.0843802449381 396% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.390802998412 0.15604864568 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.354355842008 0.0819641961636 432% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.