The line graph shows how many people visited three museums in London namely British museum, science museum and natural history museum from June to September in the 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of visitors to British museum and science museum slightly increased over the period, while the visitors to natural history museum slightly reduced in the same period.
In the month of June in 2013, the quantity of people who visited British museum and science museum were 600 and 400 respectively. The number of visitors to British museum increased sharply to 750 in July. However, between July and August this figure dropped dramatically to 500. From that point, it went up gradually and reaching almost 650 at the end of the period. In the mean time, the visitors number in science museum gradually fell to 300 between June and August. Then there was a growth of almost 150 people and by September it reached 450.
On the other hand, the quantity of people who visited natural history museum came down gradually from almost 550 to less than 400 and remained almost stable till august. But again this figure saw a slight increase to nearly 500 at the end of the period
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um from June to September in the 2013. Overall, it can be seen that the number ...
^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the end of the period. In the mean time, the visitors number in science museum gr...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple and by September it reached 450. On the other hand, the quantity of peop...
^^
Line 6, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it reached 450. On the other hand, the quantity of people who visited natur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79512195122 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2336776588 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507317073171 0.547539520022 93% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1345857248 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286038438243 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116631223426 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108860588349 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190426627309 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119649254642 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.