The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented chart compares 3 cities in terms of global meetings they organized between 1965 and 2010.
Overall, international conferences were held in all cities over the period. In addition, while the figures for city A and city B generally decreased, there was an opposite trend in that of city C.
Turning into detail, 35 foreign meetings were organized in city A in 1965, which was a bit higher than a more-than-30-conference number of city B. In the next 20 years, while the figure for city B declined gradually to exactly 25 conferences, that of city A fell sharply to 20 meetings in 1975 before growing substantially by 10 conferences in 1985. Throughout the remainders of the period, oscillation were witnessed in both the number for city A and city B, remaining at over 20 and 25 conferences, respectively.
Regarding to city C, starting at only 5, its number of international meetings doubled in 1975. The figure grew considerably to more than 25 conferences in the next 20 years. It declined slightly before reaching the peak of 30 meetings in 2010, surpassing two remaining cities as the most popular venue for global conferences among three surveyed hosts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was an opposite trend in that of city C. Turning into detail, 35 foreign meetings...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00507614213 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21965894399 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1314385067 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183624799717 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091472608111 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266701892601 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126951929291 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142948901866 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.