The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city, by gender.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph shows how many men and women in Marysville paid for cell phone service from 1995 to 2015. The number of subscribers of each gender rose at similar rates during the ten-year period.
The number of male cell phone subscribers rose significantly between 1995 and 2015. In 1995, a little over 500 men subscribed to cell phone service. The number increased considerably over the next few years until it reached 2500 in the year 2005. There was no change in the number of subscribers between 2005 and 2010. Then, the number rose slightly between 2010 and 2015, when there were about 2750 male subscribers.
Similarly, the number of women subscribing to cell phone service rose in most years between 1995 and 2015. In 1995, 500 women subscribed to cell phone service. By 2005, the number of female subscribers had increased to 2500.
There was a slight drop to about 2250 subscribers between 2005 and 2010, and that number stayed steady between 2010 and 2015.
Overall, while the numbers of both male and female subscribers rose significantly, they rose more for men.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ar rates during the ten-year period. The number of male cell phone subscribers r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50446407382 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.5850201738 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.25 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190008936512 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967978529449 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436714418256 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122394311854 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559389341281 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.29 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.