The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four different tourist attractions in Brighton at five-year intervals from 1980 to 2010.
Generally speaking, the percentage visiting the Pavilion and Pier increased over the period, while the proportion of visitors to Art Gallery and Festival drop.
In 1980, Pier was the least popular Brighton attraction with just 10% of tourists. Despite some minor fluctuation, this figure rose from 12% in 2000 to roughly 22% in 2010. The percentage visiting Pavilion had grown gradually for the first 15 years and then reached the highest point of the whole graph, approximately 48% in 1955. However, this figure then decline to 35% and 30% in 2000 and 2010 respectively.
The most common Brighton attraction in 1980 for visitors to England was Festival with exactly 30% tourists. However, this figure had decreased slightly to 28% by 2010. There was just above 20% tourists visiting Art Gallery in 1980. It rose significantly to more than 35% in 1985 but this then decreased dramatically to less than 10% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd then reached the highest point of the whole graph, approximately 48% in 1955. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09550561798 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74201621947 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2700927618 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159865220344 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640124467362 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781762837542 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11701965069 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898191587571 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.