The supplied diagram presents information about the visitors’ percentage in four different attractions namely art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival in Brighton. Overall more tourists preferred visiting pavilion while the attractions of art gallery among tourists decreased over time.
As is presented in the line graph, initially in 1980, 10% tourists in England visited pier in Brighton which was the least percentage among the give four spots. In this year festival attracted highest percentage of tourists (30%) while art gallery and pavilion received about 22-25% of total tourists. After 5 years the percentage of visit in art gallery by tourists in England rocketed and reached to over 38%. In this year this was the highest percentage of visit among the given four attractions. At that time popularity of pier and pavilion both increased with 15% and about 27% respectively while the opposite trend could be observed in case of the festival. After 1985, the popularity of pavilion started booming and reached to the pick at about 48% in 1995. In this year festival and art gallery managed to get about 22-25% tourists. Finally in the year 2010, the percentage of tourists in art gallery reached to its lowest (below 10%) while pavilion received more than 30% of tourists which was the highest. The other two attractions received about 22-28 percent tourists in this year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, third, in the third place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98324022346 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67903745012 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4498428491 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149815331438 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726489994058 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107599606959 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123438572753 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104899877011 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.